Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 8:44:19 GMT -5
It's on the Family Channel at 11:00AM eastern time.
I never saw it, the reviews weren't very positive as a "racing" movie, and I heard it misrepresented some of the circumstances surrounding the horse.
|
|
|
Post by Challedon on May 10, 2014 9:24:34 GMT -5
the story was " Disney-fied" you have to have a hero and a villiam I thought it was borderline awful they made Pancho Martin look like a clown
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 10:49:29 GMT -5
First impressions - that was NOT Aqueduct's paddock, Secretariat's first race was in the 2nd race, not the 4th race, and I don't think he was #4 (I could be wrong about that) Why is Lucien Lauren so tall, and thin? And as of "a couple of weeks" before his first race he hadn't been named yet?
They just showed a race from "Saratoga Park"!
I'm beginning to see what people said when it first came out.
I went back to his pps to check his first few races, and noticed something I'd never realized before - Secretariat was the favorite in every one of his 21 races.
|
|
|
Post by Evelyn on May 10, 2014 13:16:31 GMT -5
One of the most disappointing films ever! But it's a Hollywood flick - not a documentary and la la land doesn't aim for facts! I couldn't believe the horses they used - ugh - looked nothing like Big Red!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 13:33:53 GMT -5
I wound up watching about 2/3 of it before I had to go out. It was a total work of fiction and unrealistic - from the actors chosen for most of the parts to the portrayal of some of his races. They even had the saddle number wrong in one of them! Frank Martin was a surly guy, but not the villain they showed him as in the movie. They did the movie on the cheap, and it shows.
But, I have to admit that the guy who played Eddie Sweat was great - and he sounded just like Sweat (and had the same pants, too!!)
How long after the Belmont did the movie go on, did they do the rest of his races too?
|
|
|
Post by Evelyn on May 10, 2014 15:13:21 GMT -5
From IMBD: The film reportedly cost between 30-35M to make and Grossed 59.7M so guess Disney was pleased. Seabiscuit gross revenue was 143M. It was a far better film.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 16:01:39 GMT -5
Seabiscuit was a much more realistic movie, and for the most part factually correct (although there were a few exaggerations in it, too). But I liked the first Seabiscuit movie better, but that may be because I'm just an old fart.
|
|
|
Post by mackdaddy on May 10, 2014 16:02:18 GMT -5
Where was any mention of Riva Ridge in 1972? They made Mrs Penny look like an idiot. One positive, Otto Thorwarth can act! He sure as shit couldnt ride
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 17:21:54 GMT -5
Where was any mention of Riva Ridge in 1972? They made Mrs Penny look like an idiot. One positive, Otto Thorwarth can act! He sure as shit couldnt ride Hey, what's your beef with him? He had one graded stakes win (Gr. 3) in more than 10,000 rides. I'd say that's pretty good. But this morning was the first time I ever heard a French Canadian with a touch of a southern accent!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 17:58:34 GMT -5
ev..................not disagreeing with you!!!!
one of the most disappointing movies I have ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Evelyn on May 10, 2014 18:12:19 GMT -5
ev..................not disagreeing with you!!!! one of the most disappointing movies I have ever seen. LOL I sure hope we don't get a blizzard in May! It really was bad!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2014 21:58:08 GMT -5
I understand Satan is complaining about the low temperatures!!
|
|