Jon
Administrator
Posts: 4,669
|
Post by Jon on Sept 24, 2013 20:38:03 GMT -5
Churchill Downs Inc. loses effort to overturn Texas online gambling ban Written by Gregory A. Hall The Courier-Journal
A federal judge in Texas has ruled against Churchill Downs Inc. in its challenge of a Texas law that bans online gambling offered by Churchill’s TwinSpires.com.
TwinSpires had been taking bets from Texas residents during the lawsuit, but will stop beginning Wednesday, Churchill spokeswoman Courtney Norris Yopp said in a statement. An appeal is planned, she said, adding “We ... are optimistic that our legal arguments will prevail.”
The dispute goes to a key part of Churchill’s diversification beyond racetracks. The company started TwinSpires in 2007 to take wagers by phone and over the Internet. The Texas dispute stems from the Texas Racing Commission's recent efforts to enforce a law that requires betting on horse racing to be done in person at a track. The 1986 law was revised in 2011 to explicitly ban Internet wagering.
Churchill argued that the “in-person” requirements are a violation of the U.S. Constitution's interstate commerce clause. But Judge James R. Nowlin rejected that argument.
“Churchill Downs and other entities like it do have the option of reaching Texas bettors via the simulcast system that Texas law sanctions,” he wrote.
It also prevents even Texas-based wagering companies from accepting bets online, Nowlin said.
|
|
|
Post by mackdaddy on Sept 25, 2013 7:27:47 GMT -5
Its a matter of time when no live racing is gone too. Texas is the 2nd largest state with good paying jobs everywhere and no state income tax. Sadly, the tracks that run throughout the year have lousy pools because nobody cares about racing there. Time and time again its come to a vote to bring in slots and its a no go.
|
|
|
Post by Challedon on Sept 25, 2013 11:13:06 GMT -5
The Texas situation situation sounds very similar to what was going on in Illinois at the beginning. In Texas, as in Illinois is wasn't legal, but it also wasn't illegal for ADWs to take bets. TheTexas tracks wanted $$$ and woke a sleeping dog. The anti-gambling clan in Texas, which is very large, told the tracks support a bill which would make ADWs illegal or we will shut you down. The future does not look bright in Texas for racing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2013 11:43:30 GMT -5
Didn't Illinois have a problem earlier this year too with ADW wagers?
I don't know why states are so stringent about who and where resident can make bets with.
For a long time, technically online bets were illegal in Connecticut too, but the state chose to not enforce the law. Now that Connecticut OTB has their own online system, all others are legal too.
Similar thing with NY - I have a NYRA account, but I can't make online bets. I can call in bets by telephone, and use my NYRA card when I'm at the track.
These laws all seem so bizarre - I know in Texas it's a so-called "moral" thing, but certainly not in New York or Connecticut, or even Illinois.
|
|
|
Post by Challedon on Sept 25, 2013 11:46:17 GMT -5
Illinois ADW law expired and a new one needed to be approved. The current one expires fairly soon so the whole thing could be a mess again. It's all a game between the politicians, casino lobbyists etc.
|
|